<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Cadillac CTS Diesel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dieselautoblog.com/cadillac/2009-cadillac-cts-diesel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dieselautoblog.com/cadillac/2009-cadillac-cts-diesel/</link>
	<description>News and commentary on Diesel powered cars and trucks.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; A look back at six diesel cars and trucks from the 80&#8217;s - Diesel Auto Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dieselautoblog.com/cadillac/2009-cadillac-cts-diesel/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; A look back at six diesel cars and trucks from the 80&#8217;s - Diesel Auto Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dieselautoblog.com/?p=27#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] for every Cadillac for 1979. This engine had bad reliability, for more about this, check out the 2009 Cadillac CTS diesel article. It&#8217;s kind of a comparison article for the old and new Cadillac diesel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for every Cadillac for 1979. This engine had bad reliability, for more about this, check out the 2009 Cadillac CTS diesel article. It&#8217;s kind of a comparison article for the old and new Cadillac diesel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
